Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Soriano The Evolutionist

"I am part of the animal kingdom." - E. Soriano personal motto

I believe Soriano is an evolutionist. And I also believe that he will deny this claim vehemently and yet unknowingly validate it at the same time. He will try to bob and weave himself from this claim and direct the discussion elsewhere using his method of picking and choosing words from the Bible and then picking and choosing the meaning of the words that best suits his opinions. He will claim to believe only in the Bible but he will also subscribe to evolution all in the same breath. Which by all means is a hypocrite's stance for a supposed man of God. The following is another proof of how Soriano undermines what is Biblical with his opinions.

Evolutionists have long kept and protected their belief of an old earth that has been around for billions of years. Of which they have not one shred of proof. The best they can come up with are two theories. The big bang and evolution of man. Both theories are just that, theories! For something to be called "a science" like this evolution lie they're shoving down our throats, it has to go through the scientific process of proving. They have to be observable, testable, demonstrable, and repeatable. Evolution and the big bang fail in all of these miserably. Evolution is NOT science. It's a religion that willfully takes God away from the creation picture.

Now why do I say Soriano is an evolutionist? Because he will not accept that the earth is just about 6000 years old like the Bible shows us, and instead he would have people believe as he believes through the handiwork of evolutionists, that the earth is billions of years old. Soriano would deny the Bible's account of Jesus's genealogy which is clearly recorded from generation to generation, from father to son, and from Adam to Joseph (Jesus's adoptive father). Why? Because according to Soriano, not all 12 sons of Israel had their genealogies expressed in the Bible. He says Dan's lineage is missing so the Bible is incomplete, and without Dan's lineage, the Bible could not be a book of genealogy and could not be a good record of the age of the earth. So basing the age of the earth according to the genealogies in the Bible would be a "gross miscalculation".

This is a very poor defense for Soriano. One that any layman can take apart. In fact, I'm going to try and crack it wide open. Dan's genealogy is not in the Bible because it is not essential to trace the lineage of Jesus from Adam. Only the essential characters are mentioned even if only so briefly, to keep account of who begat who. Apart from a few notable women characters, the Bible often negates mentioning the mothers. Just the fathers who begat sons. The Bible is also keen in noting at what age fathers begat their sons. The Biblical record of genealogies is amazing. In fact if you chart out the lineage from Adam, you will find that Noah may have met grandpa Adam!

Soriano would then bring up diamonds as elements that need billions of years to be formed. This appears to be a major basis for him to deny a God that can create everything in six 24 hour days. It's not surprising given the fact that Soriano teaches that God is not omnipotent. Apparently, Soriano is not aware that man has been manufacturing diamonds for decades already. Real science has discovered that the right combination of heat and pressure will produce diamonds similar to how diamonds are formed naturally. This proves that it does not take millions or billions of years to form a diamond. Evolution along with Soriano is debunked by real science.

Soriano is subtly attacking the creation account of the Bible. Futile though, because the Bible is perfect, complete, and absolute. By perfect it means it is inerrant, by complete it means it is not missing anything, and by absolute, it means it is the final word on anything. Belief in evolution means you put death before sin, which is directly opposite to what scripture says. Evolution preaches that through death, everything has evolved into today's fittest creatures. The Bible tells us that through Adam, sin entered into the world and then death followed (Romans 5:12 Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin;).

There is no evolution involved in creation. God would not need millions of years to create. God only needs to speak things into existence!



  1. it's pretty obvious that someday in the future, when humanity extinct and earth evolve into the planet of the apes, and he will be a god of the apes...

  2. Most natural diamonds are formed at high temperature and pressure at depths of 140 to 190 kilometers (87 to 120 mi) in the Earth's mantle. Carbon-containing minerals provide the carbon source, and the growth occurs over periods from 1 billion to 3.3 billion years (25% to 75% of the age of the Earth). Diamonds are brought close to the Earth′s surface through deep volcanic eruptions by a magma, which cools into igneous rocks known as kimberlites and lamproites. Diamonds can also be produced synthetically in a high-pressure high-temperature process which approximately simulates the conditions in the Earth mantle. An alternative, and completely different growth technique is chemical vapor deposition (CVD). Several non-diamond materials, which include cubic zirconia and silicon carbide and are often called diamond simulants, resemble diamond in appearance and many properties. Special gemological techniques have been developed to distinguish natural and synthetic diamonds and diamond simulants.

  3. saan nabasa ng dukhang waldas na ang earth ay millions or billions of years ng nag e exist??? I believe that God can create diamonds even in just 1 hour !!!! the stand of SORIANO that the earth has been in existence for a long time (MILLIONS OF YEARS) goes against what is written in the Bible.......illusyon lang ni SORIANO yan!!!! kaya siya nalampaso sa debate niya kay Dr' Grady ay dahil sa mga illusyon at opinyon na wala naman sa Biblia......

    1. I just saw the Dr. Grady debate... lampaso nga si Soriano. Nagmukhang shoshonga-shonga. Hahaha.

    2. kayo pala ang totoong sa Dios, eh bakit si soriano ang nakaka isip ng libreng sakay, libreng aral, libreng medical mission, libreng transient home at kung ano ano pang libre na walang hinihingin kapalit. at i post mo sa FB kung saan kamo natalo ng debate si soriano, ipag malaki mo..o bk ikaw lang ang nahihibang...


  5. I LIKE THE NAME.....iglesia SODOMISTA.......LOL

  6. I need biblical explanation that one day of God is one day in earth or in our day. And please explain how did the scientist came up that diamonds where formed million of years when the earth is in thousand years old?

    1. Genesis creation account says...

      -The EVENING and the MORNING was THE (definite singular article)first/second/third/fourth/fifth/sixth day.

      -The Bible tells us that God created all manner of foliage on the 3rd day. This would include all the flowering and non-flowering plants, trees, shrubs, bushes, etc.

      This shows us that there is no period of millions of years before Day 4. Why? Because on Day 4, the Bible tells us that God created the sun, moon, and stars. The sun is what's responsible for the plants to make food (photosynthesis). It would be very hard on those plants to have to wait millions of years for the sun to come up, right?

      -The Bible tells us that God created all the creatures of the air and sea on the 5th day. Creatures that swim and creatures that fly. Among these are the countless number and variety of insects. Insects that are responsible for the pollination of plants.

      The bible is telling us a LITERAL DAY (24 hours). This is not a long time for plants to wait for the sun. Nor is another twenty four hours for the pollinators to do their jobs.

  7. Can God hibernate every living things? Could this be possible? What is then the difference of the day in Gen 1:3-5 and the light mentioned in verses 14-18?

    Scientifically! I will repeat my question. How did the scientist came up that diamonds where formed million of years when the earth is in thousand years old? and in what explanation that we can see the farthest stars in our naked eyes if their distance between is in million light years?

    1. God can do anything.
      What matters is what he has written in the Bible.
      If it is not written, you can only speculate.


      Scientifically explain millions of years?

      Real science does not even support evolution.
      For something to be a science, it has to be empirically proven with facts. It means it has to be testable, repeatable, demonstrable, and observable. Evolution is NONE of that. Shame on you for even trying the science avenue to defend Soriano.

      You need to read up on what modern science is discovering. Did you know that science has already learned to speed up light faster than 180,000 miles per second? Not only that, they also found that light can be slowed down to a COMPLETE STOP. So using the millions of lightyears argument to support the "millions of years" is already irrelevant.


  8. Ker Than
    for National Geographic News
    Published December 5, 2012
    Just when you thought dinosaurs couldn't get any older, the oldest dinosaur has been found in Africa, a new study says.
    The fossils push back the dawn of the dinosaurs to around 240 million years ago—about 10 to 15 million years earlier than previously thought, scientists say.
    Dubbed Nyasasaurus parringtoni, the animal is only known from an upper arm and some back bones discovered in Tanzania in the 1930s but only recently studied in detail.
    Prior to the new analysis, the oldest known dinosaur fossils belonged to small, lightly built, meat-eating creatures found in South America that dated to around 230 million years ago.

    Are these people liars? or Soriano alone? I think it would be better to call Soriano a liar than to those who discover the fossils. Agree? Mr. Wolf!

    Magsalita naman kayo na may batayan para hindi kayo mababalingan na sinungaling. Buksan nalang ninyo ang inyong puso't isipan at magsuri kayo at hanapin ninyo ang karunongan ng Dios ng inyong buong puso.

    Katotohanan ang hanapin hindi ang kamalian ng tao. Kabaliktaran kasi ang ginagawa ninyo tapus nanlalait pa kayo ng tao. Mali talaga ang inyong nakita.

    1. If you are going to base your defense of Soriano on science, you better read and study real science.

      Ipapakilala kita kay CHARLES LYELL. Isang taong galit as Diyos at gagawin ang kahit ano para maitatwa ang katotohanang may Diyos. Siya ang nagpanukalang ang mundo ay binubuo ng "layers" na nagsasaad ng "periods of time". Mas kilala natin ang imbensyon niya bilang "Geologic Time Scale". Pinanukala niya ito halos 200 years ago. Pero hanggang ngayon walang lugar sa mundo na magpapakita ng ginawa niyang layers.

      Malaking impluwensiya ang Geologic Time Scale sa binuong panukala ni Darwin na Evolution. At sinabi niya na marahil ay may mga "transitional humans" (yung mga ungoy na unti-unting naging tao) na matatagpuan sa mga periods of time na nabanggit ni Lyle.

      Fast forward 150 years... Milyun-milyon ang nahukay na kalansay ng tao, at milyun-milyon ang nahukay na kalansay ng unggoy... pero NI ISA wala nung mga transitional humans.

      Tig-isa lang ang natagpuan na "katibayan kuno" Pero bawat isa ay napatunayang huwad. (Dapat magbasa ka rin tungkol sa mga sinasabing Nebraska Man, Piltdown Man, Lucy, etc. para malaman mong huwad ang mga ito ayon mismo sa siyensya.)

      Shame on you for using FRAUDULENT BELIEFS to support Soriano's attack on God's Creation Week.

  9. Hello! Why are you introducing me to Lyell na isang sinungaling sabi mo, and for your info I disgrace Darwin's theory. And tell me where to trust? sa iyong Logic? aren't the people who discover those fossils trustworthy? Ikaw, sino ba ang pinaniniwalaan mo? yourself? your own logic?

    I am not defending soriano's, I am just standing the truth and standing besides physical evidences. Ano naman ang maipapakita mong physical evidences to disprove the discoveries and to prove your own logic that the earth is only in thousand years old?

    Ito ay hindi logic, Sabi ng Dios, " Unang araw, ikalawang araw, ikatatlong araw" ito ba ay 24 Hrs? Sa ika apat ng kanyang araw ay ginawa niya ang sun to divide the day and the night sa lupa para magiging tanda sa mga panahon, ano yon? Seasons, Days and for sure this is the 24-hr day. Kaya iba ang araw ng Dios kay sa atin and a day of the Lord is not a 24-hr day and this is a logic, ang Dios ay wala namang relo para sabihin niya na ang isang araw ay 24-hrs, ang relo ay sa ating mundo lang.

    1. Hindi ba't tintanong mo ang batayan ng evolutionists na "millions of years"? Nagsimula iyan sa mga theory nina Lyell at Darwin.

      If you stand for the truth, you stand for WHAT THE BIBLE SAYS. Not what Soriano, or Darwin says.


      The Bible is enough proof. Sabi ng Bibliya Adam was THE FIRST MAN. Bilangin mo ang mga taon (lahat dineklara ng Bibliya) mula kay Adan Hanggang kay Jesus... around 4000 years lang. Mula kay Jesus papunta sa ngayon, mahigit 2000 lang. Iyan ang batayan ko.

      Pasensiya ka na kung BIBLIYA ANG SUMASAGOT kaya 6000 years lang.

  10. It is true we can compute the years from Adam to Jesus and from Jesus to our present day. But, there is no exact computation from the creation of the earth to the time where God created Adam,
    Adam was created on the sixth day at hindi naman sinabi ng Dios na ang kanyang isang araw ay isang araw din sa mundo nating, but base in the bible you can get clue or hint how old the earth then. As I said, Diamonds, Stars, Dino as they say at marami pa, with the help science makikita mo talaga na million of years na ang mundo not unless gusto mong paniwalaan na ginawa ng Dios ang lahat na magic lang. Do believe in dinos? kung naniniwala ka, gawin mong isa sa batayan kasi magkalapit lang ang pagitan ng paglalang ng Dios sa tao kung basi sa araw ng iyong pinaniwalaan. Bakit mo ba na sabi na ang isang araw ng Dios ay litiral na 24-hr day?

    1. I think you are just trolling now.

      Science does not prove millions of years. It actually proves against millions of years. Real science has discovered diamonds can be created in just a matter of days. Science has discovered that light can be sped up and slowed down. Science even discovered it does not take millions of years for something dead to fossilize! Triple knockout ang inaabot ng Evolution dahil sa totoong science.

      Ikaw ang huwag maging sarado ang isip, at pag-aralan mo muna ang tungkol sa mga inaangkin ng Evolution bago mo isuko ang paniniwala mo dito. Huwag kang pumaris kay Soriano.

      Kaya totoong kaipokrituhan ang ginagawa ni Soriano. Bibliya lang daw ang batayan niya pero naniniwala sa hindi sinasaad ng Bibliya.

    2. Who are true to you then? are their any one? or may be you are fraud?. Could you show some evidences to prove your stand? specially that science has discovered that light can be sped up and slowed down.

  11. Hey Wolf in the Hen House,
    What a pityful conclusion. Bro. Soriano is also against evolution and other unproven theories. Evolution is only a theory, Big Bang is also a theory, They are not included in REAL science. But the bible is the most scientific book I knew. It is not against Dinosaurs, it is not against that earth is billion of yrs old, etc. Before humans discover something, it is already written thousand yrs ago. Before human knew genetics and heredity, it is already in the bible. Before humans knew that is not good to eat pork, it is already in the bible (although eating pork is not prohibited now). They are many things which is already written in the bible, but is only discovered a few years ago by humans. YOU, Wolf in the Hen House is the ONE that is against the BIBLE and SCIENCE. Don't make opposition between science and the Bible. :D

    Prove something FIRST. ^_^

  12. The Earth is not just 6000 years old according to the BIBLE.

    In Gen 1:1-5 it says,

    In the beginning, God created the HEAVENS and the earth. 2 The earth was without form and void, and darkness was over the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters.
    3 And God said, "Let there be light," and there was light. 4 And God saw that the light was good. And God separated the light from the darkness. 5 God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And there was evening and there was morning, the FIRST day.

    The bible tells us, in the beginning God created the HEAVENS and the earth. Then, God said, let there be light and there was light. Then he separated light from darkness. Then, it was the FIRST day.


    There are no day/s or night/s yet on earth on the first day.
    It was the first day on the "HEAVENS and earth", or the so-called UNIVERSE, which is now 13.5 billion years old if I'm not mistaken.

    Do you want another proof that it is not the first day on earth?

    In Gen 1:14-19 it says,

    And God said, "Let there be lights in the expanse of the heavens to separate the day from the night. And let them be for signs and for seasons, and for days and years, and let them be lights in the expanse of the heavens to give light upon the earth." And it was so. And God made the two great lights—the greater light to rule the day and the lesser light to rule the night—and the stars. And God set them in the expanse of the heavens to give light on the earth, to rule over the day and over the night, and to separate the light from the darkness. And God saw that it was good. And there was evening and there was morning, the fourth day.

    The bible tells us that in the fourth day, God created lights AGAIN. That time, God created lights again for.Earth, the two great lights nearest to us—the Sun and the Moon—and the stars. This are the LIGHTS that separated days, months, seasons and years on Earth. Therefore, the beginning of days and nights here on Earth occur in the fourth day.

    Don't be confused that 1 day to God = 1000 years to us. You are WRONG. Then you make false conclusion that God made the creation within six days, or 6000 years to us, then conclude also that Earth is 6000 years old. You MISUNDERSTOOD it.

    In 2 Peter 3:8 it says,

    But do not overlook this one fact, beloved, that with the Lord one day IS AS a thousand years, and a thousand years AS one day.

    The figure of speech used is simile. It expresses a resemblance, similarity, or "LIKENESS" between things. So it means that 1 day to God is similar to 1000 years, there is no difference. God is eternal, there is no difference between seconds, minutes, hours, days, and years for him. God is not included in time. He made time itself. So it is not right to have crazy conclusion that 6 days of creation = 6000 years = age of Earth. You are ABSOLUTELY wrong.

    The earth is not just 6000 years old. It is 4.5+- 1 billion years old according to SCIENCE. Don't contradict science with the Bible. Don't contradict Bible with science. The Bible and the TRUE Science will never ever contradict each other.

    The Bible is the most scientifc book that ever exist on earth.


    1. You are either being absolutely naive... or absolutely dumb.
      Genesis 1:1 says. "In the beginning God made the Heavens and the earth."
      The following verses tells us *HOW* God made the Heavens and the earth.

      This is no different than saying... "At class today, I made Diet Coke erupt from the bottle." After saying that initial statement, I tell everybody *HOW* I did it. Get it?


      You are injecting PRESUMPTION by insinuating that God only started creating (Day 1) on verse 3. What did God do on verse 2? Hover over the face of the waters for billions of years?
      Come on!


      The Bible is very clear and concise and as FOOLPROOF as possible when it said "And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were THE first day.

      What the heck are you saying "There are no day/s or night/s yet on earth on the first day."


      The Bible shows us (through genealogy of Adam to Jesus), that the Earth is 6000 years old.
      Evolution (False Science) says the Earth is billions of years old.
      And they do not contradict?
      That's the dumbest thing I read all week.

      I actually think I'm getting dumb by just reading (and replying) to your nonsense.